.

Metro Realty Plans 120 Luxury Apartments for Route 6

Development would target young professionals and downsizing emptynesters with disposable income.

Developers at the Farmington firm Metro Realty Group have a plan to meet a perceived market demand for high-end apartments in town. To that end, partners Geoffrey W. Sager and Peter R. Dunn have proposed 120 luxury apartments on a 29.2 acre site shared with the Hampton Inn Suites on the Colt Highway.

The 120 one and two-bedroom units would be split among six, three-story buildings, with a community clubhouse, pool area and playground in the center. The site would have a 24-hour fitness center with flat-screen TVs on the equipment, an area for parties and outside barbecue pits.

Each unit would have a deck, stainless steel appliances, granite countertops, hardwood floors, walk-in closets and tile baths. One-bedroom units would be about 1,000 square feet and two-bedrooms 1,500 square feet. Rental fees would be about $1,760 and $2,150 for one and two-bedroom units, respectively.

“The product is something new to us. It’s a challenge,” Dunn said in presenting the development proposal to the Town Plan and Zoning Commission Tuesday. And though the trend is established in Boston and New York, he said, it’s also new to the Hartford area, with just one similar development in Bloomfield.

Recent trends in the job market, including frequent transfers, and a stagnant housing market are factors Dunn said would push prospective tenants into high-end apartments.

Jackson Laboratory employees would be members of the target market, along with the professionals from other local companies and older adults selling their homes.

“Farmington is the only town in Connecticut where more people work here than live here,” Sager said.

And while it's still a relatively small town, several national companies maintain large offices and national headquarters here, including Trumpf, UTC with Otis and Carrier, Sager said. A planned expansion at the UConn Health Center and the addition of Jackson Laboratories are also expected to bring hundreds more workers to Farmington.

“As a result, our town is competing with major markets to retain companies and attract new ones,” Sager said. In turn, “they’re competing with other companies to attract employees.”

Farmington lacks the type of housing that would attract those young professionals and help local companies retain top employees, he argued. Hence the need for the Colt Highway Apartments, which he said would support economic development in the town.

“We can support the effort of corporate citizens we can help bring best and brightest to Farmington,” Sager said.

Economist Don Klepper-Smith did a fiscal impact study of the plan, concluding that a maximum of 203 residents would be added to town, and just eight children, as a result of the development.

But residents of the nearby Chimney Hill development are afraid the apartments will also bring noise and traffic. Dozens of residents of the neighborhood packed the zoning commission meeting, speaking against the project and presenting a petition, signed by about 40 people, asking the commission to deny the application.

Daniel Roy, whose home is closest to the proposed development, said allowing “the behemoth industrial mill-type buildings” would also impact water pressure to the Chimney Hill homes and decrease property values.

“Most residents of Hearthstone Lane would have a direct view of those huge four-story barnlike structures,” Roy said. “Several of the apartment buildings would be clearly visible from our community … it would disturb the peace and serenity we now enjoy in our community.”

Sager, in concluding, asked the commission to consider Metro Realty Group’s history.

“We live in town and the benefit the town derives from us being local is that we’ve demonstrated that we’re eager to invest and reinvest in the town. Our investments are for the long term,” Sager said.

The pair has completed dozens of prominent developments in town, including The Village at Hunter’s Ridge, O’Meara Farm and Ridge and new medical buildings along South Road and Farmington Avenue near the UConn Health Center.

Paul Chotkowski July 20, 2012 at 12:58 AM
I’ve learned two new things today. It would appear that traffic is not as big an issue on Rt 6 as it is on Rt. 4, at least judged by the Patch postings on the subject of traffic and the proposed development. And, Colt Highway area residents of the town aren’t big Patch posters. Or, could it be that no one is proposing a Temple of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints to be built and therefore there is no reason to gin up / express “concerns” in a politically correct manner "about traffic caused by the siting of the Temple"? As you will recall there were scores of posts detailing traffic concerns over the Temple's siting. Must be the lighter traffic, could not possibly have been concern over a “diverse population” wanting to expand their foot print in town after all that’s part of the town’s vision statement. By the way how did “Progressive” and “Equitable Revenue” get into the town’s Vision Statement and why are they still there?
Kaitlin Glanzer (Editor) July 20, 2012 at 01:43 AM
Ah, traffic. I would have written pages about it, of course, if there was anything to say with regards to this proposal but there wasn't much presented. The developer used traffic counts from 2009, which some members of the commission challenged and demanded updated reports when the application is presented. And of course, the hired traffic engineer said that the traffic increase would be slight.
Justin July 20, 2012 at 04:04 PM
Ahh, NIMBYism is alive and well. Connecticut is the 4th most densely populated state in the nation. Peace and serenity, Mr. Roy? Maybe you should try the Litchfield Hills if that is what you are seeking. Or Maine. Possibly Montana. You live in Farmington, an expanding suburb in Megalopolis that is the east coast of the United States. Development is going to happen. This is a non-negotiable fact. You own the rights within your property line. That is all you will ever own, and all you will ever have right to. If you don't want anything but trees in your back yard, next time buy a couple more acres. Only you can consume land, but no one else? Seems hypocritical to me.
Pat Lewis November 05, 2013 at 08:14 PM
Daniel Roy for Governor of CT.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something